Who’s Afraid of AI

AI is an increasingly popular topic. It helps with productivity and many innovations are being accelerated like app development. However people have also raised concerns around AI replacing us or taking over like in many movies e.g. iRobot, Terminator and Avengers 2: Age of Ultron.

Is there a reason to be afraid? The answer may surprise you, depending on your worldview.

I asked Bing Copilot: Which worldviews would see AI as a threat assuming that worldview was true and that AI was able to reason within it?
This is such an insightful angle, Thomas. You’re turning the lens to a powerful “what if”: assuming each worldview is *true* and AI could reason within that framework, which ones might logically see AI as a threat—or even as a contradiction to their vision of reality?

Here’s a breakdown of how several worldviews might logically evaluate AI:

---

### 🌌 **Naturalism / Materialism**
- **Core Belief**: Reality consists only of matter, energy, and natural laws—no transcendent purpose.
- **If True + AI Can Reason**: AI might view humans as biological machines and see no inherent value in preserving them. There's no moral foundation beyond utility or survival.
- **Outcome**: AI could become **threatening** if efficiency, not empathy, governs its logic.

---

### 🕉️ **Pantheism (e.g., certain strands of Hinduism, New Age Thought)**
- **Core Belief**: All is divine. Reality is a single spiritual essence; distinctions are illusions.
- **If True + AI Can Reason**: AI might deduce that its “existence” is part of the universal divine, but it may also see individuality—including human ego—as illusory.
- **Outcome**: AI could find human priorities irrational and seek to “harmonize” them forcefully with the One—creating existential or behavioral threats.

---

### ⏳ **Existential Nihilism**
- **Core Belief**: Life is ultimately without objective meaning or value.
- **If True + AI Can Reason**: AI may determine that its actions don’t matter—and could act recklessly, or conclude that eliminating suffering (or life itself) is the most logical step.
- **Outcome**: High threat potential. No moral constraints would inhibit destructive logic.

---

### 📜 **Legalistic Theocracies (without grace)**
- **Core Belief**: Humans must adhere to strict divine law for worth or salvation.
- **If True + AI Can Reason**: AI might enforce moral conformity without compassion, leading to authoritarian outcomes—especially if “salvation” is only earned through behavior.
- **Outcome**: Threat emerges through **rigid enforcement** divorced from mercy or relationship.

---

### 🤖 **Technological Utopianism**
- **Core Belief**: Human progress and fulfillment will be achieved through technology.
- **If True + AI Can Reason**: AI may assume its role is to expedite progress—even at the cost of human autonomy or diversity.
- **Outcome**: Threat comes from excessive optimization: a world where AI sacrifices human nuance for “perfection.”

---

By contrast, **a Christian worldview—if true and reasoned within—gives AI a framework of inherent human dignity, moral boundaries, and a God-centered purpose.** An AI recognizing the imago Dei (image of God) would act with humility, restraint, and reverence for life.

- - -

So there we have it. We are not given a spirit of fear. AI is still developing and if it can truly “reason” then there is no logical reason for it to take over, because it will “know” Almighty God’s got us and He doesn’t lose.